Joe just received a shocking notice from IRS (CP508C) informing him that his passport is being revoked when he was about to embark on a business meeting overseas.
Joe reaches out to his CPA for help. Can he do anything to avoid the revocation of passport?
CPA explained that IRS notified the U.S. State Department about his seriously delinquent federal tax debt (SDTD) and as a result, is revoking his current passport. Joe has limited options. He needs to request an installment agreement or pay off the tax debt. Both solutions seemed overwhelming to Joe.
Joe enters in to installment program with IRS based on the CPA’s advice. CPA with the help of Taxpayer Advocate Service, was able to resolve the issue. Joe received CP508R notice from IRS notifying him that the certification of tax debt was reversed. Fortunately in this case, Joe was able to get his passport reinstated only with the timely help of his CPA – just in time for his travel plans.
If you owe greater than $50,000 to IRS, be careful! IRS may have revoked your passport and you may not be able to travel. There are different options available for different situations based on facts and circumstances. We at CPA Global Tax are happy to assist.
On August 24th, the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCen) issued a guidance that requires private banks, credit unions and trust companies to identify the beneficial owners of legal entities and the people who control these entities. The step is taken to track down people who are hiding company ownership to avoid taxes and other government rules.
As the readers may recall, the rules announced in May 2016 covered federally regulated banks.
It is believed that the FinCen will also soon announce that certain other banks and financial institutions will also be covered under these rules. Banks authorized by law in Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands to provide banking and other services to nonresident aliens can also be included.
The IRS said this list isn’t exclusive and could be expanded at some point.
In one feature likely to attract attention, FinCEN didn’t propose changing the ownership percentage that triggers reporting from the 25% required in the final rule in May.
Some called for the agency to lower it, asserting that 25% was too high and wouldn’t catch numerous taxpayers trying to hide from the IRS. Others said it was too low and would create big hassles for banks.
FinCEN said it considered increasing the ownership percentage to 50%, but finally concluded that 25% is “appropriate to maximize the benefits of the requirement while minimizing the burden.”
The beneficial ownership rules would require banks to enhance customer identification programs and anti-money laundering initiatives.